Blog

  • Start with One Word

    Credits: Photo by Robbin Warner. Quinn at 6 months (2016).

  • Managing Your Committee


    One of the most challenging parts of writing a dissertation is the need to work – perhaps for the first time – with a committee of scholars who will judge your writing and your preparedness for the degree. It can be difficult to juggle the need to listen to these people and follow their advice with the need to write a dissertation that matches your vision. The work becomes even more challenging when you have a conflict with one or more committee members. This is the time to remember that you are not at the mercy of each person on the committee. Your adviser is your primary connection to the committee, and keeping a good working relationship with him or her is key (we consider what to do when the adviser-advisee relationship sours in another bloglet). Therefore, work as closely as you are able with the adviser when challenges arise with other committee members. But keep an ear open to what they say, too. Their opinions may not be what you want to hear, but often, when we least want to hear something about our ideas or writing, we most need to hear just that!

    The idea is to balance the feedback you’re getting against what you’re seeing in your own idea development and writing processes. Try out their ideas. At the same time, know that what they’re saying comes from a particular point of view. Check out that point of view with the individual or committee as a whole: I hear you say XZY. Is that what you mean? How do you think I should put that into action?

    Asking questions and seeking clarification can be especially helpful as you decide how to treat conflicting advice. When possible, send a copy of important email communication to your entire committee. Always copy your adviser on communications that involve crucial decisions. Let your adviser go to bat for you when needed.

    Action Steps:

    1. Realize that this committee ultimately exists to help you. Let them do that.
    2. Keep the committee up to date on your progress. Don’t let months go by without connecting with them.
    3. Tell committee members your timeline and deadlines. They don’t keep that kind of information at their fingertips, so help them plan when to provide you with feedback by giving them key information.
    4. Avoid the “divide and conquer” approach to managing the committee by treating all of them as esteemed professors who have their own work schedules and who have your best interests at heart.
    5. Keep your adviser even more closely aware of what is happening so that you can ask for his or her help when a committee member’s advice conflicts with the adviser’s or otherwise is confusing.
    6. Managing the committee and working well with the adviser are core skills you’ll need in any academic or professional life after the PhD. Take charge, think and act carefully, and enjoy what you can about your future colleagues. They’ll respect you for your efforts.
    7. If you need help, call a coach who can walk you through the challenges of navigating committee communications and interactions. You don’t have to learn everything by trial and error, and you don’t have to go it alone!

    Artwork Credit: Artist, Richard Rutter; Title, Meeting Room Stencil Graffiti; License: CC Attribution 4.0 International. The artwork has been modified from the original.

  • The tattoo and the Ph.D.

    I don’t have a tattoo. I probably won’t get one, but I do have a Ph.D. While the degree is one I’ve earned and will always be with me–kind of like a tattoo is permanent–the goals that got me the Ph.D. and the tattoo are different in their permanence.

    When I see people who have invested in tattoos, I have a lot of different thoughts. Sometimes I like the picture and the message and sometimes I loathe them, but mostly I’m a little amused at the thought that I once might have gotten such a prominent badge that displayed my transient nature so publicly. When I was in my twenties, I often thought of myself as having finished growing and changing. I figured that what I liked then was what I would like years later. One result of that thinking was a lot of household stuff–much of it pretty–that no longer suits my tastes. Another was some expensive (for then in my life) jewelry that I felt represented me and how I wanted to appear in the world. Those purchases were symbolic tattoos for me because I believed they would always represent me.

    But my life is too transient for any one thing or earthly symbol to represent me so fully or accurately. So it is also with my career, which is a part of my life as a whole.

    A tattoo is an investment in permanence and indicates a sense of non-changeability in one’s nature–or, at least, a representation of one’s life captured in time. I’ve realized that a tattoo probably wouldn’t work for me because the dolphin or tree of life or butterfly or dove that appeals to me now most likely would not appeal later when I’ve moved to a new phase of thinking or being. With household stuff or jewelry, I can sell or give away what no longer suits; with a tattoo, I’d be faced with a costly, painful laser treatment or regret in living with my purchase.

    Some people mistake a Ph.D. or other terminal degree for a permanent mark, like a tattoo, in the sense that the goals they had while earning the degree must also be permanent. While the degree is theirs for the keeping, the goals that got them there may not be. I think that issue with goals is the root of much dissatisfaction with the post-Ph.D. project called life.

    For most of my adult life, for example, I had the goal of being a traditional academic with a professorial post, tenure, and the pleasure of seeing undergraduates and graduates through their programs. Life didn’t work out that way for me, though. I could have had such a job at various institutions in different geographic settings after I earned my degree, but a previous life as a military wife taught me that I wasn’t willing to uproot my husband and son, nor was I willing to play games with my research agenda to get tenure. It took me awhile–through my forties and into my fifties–to understand the many reasons that I didn’t fit my traditional goals. Yet, having come to such an understanding, I think I’m happier than I might have been if my initial dreams had been fulfilled. In the meantime, I’m allowing my career to unfold more naturally in the unusual, oddly shaped, and interesting ways that is has been.

    The Ph.D. holders who seem the unhappiest to me are those who hold onto their original goals despite their own natural life changes and during times of changing (and shrinking) academic opportunity. I don’t mean that they shouldn’t work toward what they want, but rather that they shouldn’t allow their goals to dictate all their choices, to include going against the wind in directions that are almost certain to make them distressed or unhappy. In that way, the goals that engendered the Ph.D. work function like a permanent tattoo that no longer represents what the individual’s life is or can be. It becomes, instead, a sort of symbol of lost opportunities or hopelessness in achieving the goal–or at the least, a sign of what once was a dream that cannot be now.

    This message is about being flexible with goals after achieving the terminal degree that is being sought. Put shape to the dream, yes. Work hard, yes. Achieve, yes. But also know that the dream is, in the end, simply a dream. It has the potential of being reshaped both by life and by the dream holder who, along the way, may have had to jettison some pieces of the younger self that no longer fit the degree holder. That’s not a bad thing. That’s life after the Ph.D. Understanding this basic reality can make one’s actual career trajectory even more enjoyable than the dream career itself!

  • When the going gets tough…

    Working on your dissertation you suddenly realize that you hate the topic, the direction its going and the entire process.

    Those feelings, while not unusual, can make the going get really tough.

    How do you get going again? I’ve encountered that problem recently with a writer I’m coaching. The topic she chose more than a year ago bores her to tears – literally! It causes stomach-wrenching pain. Three suggestions for getting over this hump come to mind.

    First, get a good dissertation guidebook.

    The one I most recommend is Destination Dissertation: A Traveler’s Guide to a Done Dissertation by Sonja K. Foss and William Waters (Rowman and Littlefield, 2007). This book proposes that a dissertation (where the research already has been gathered) can be completed in six months – from proposal to done document. I believe them because I finished writing and editing my diss in four months after collecting the data. Their process isn’t much different from what I learned for myself except for a major difference: they’ve made an art of showing dissertation writers how to do it. If you’re working with me, order a copy and we’ll use this book as one of our guides through the thinking and writing processes.

    A second thing you can do is talk to your writing coach and to your dissertation director, if he or she is someone you think you can be open with.

    You might get to change your topic (rare); more likely, though, you might get some insight as to why the topic or the diss overall has become so painful. At some point, I think most researchers hate their projects – for at least a little while. Even the most dedicated researcher can wish she was doing something else (scuba diving) somewhere else (like in Hawaii). But gaining some insight into your distress often can alleviate the worst of it, enabling you to get over the hump and to move on.

    A third thing you can do when the going gets tough – and you’ll probably hate me for this – is to just suck it down and move on anyway.

    My tai chi master tells me just to “go over it.” I always think he means to go “through” it, but maybe “over” provides the better image in that its like going beyond the pain. Its kind of like getting over yourself and not taking yourself so seriously that you feel like giving up. When I’m doing a chi gong exercise that really hurts or bores me, I tell myself I can do anything for one minute, two minutes, ten minutes, or more. When I’m into a project that’s hard for me, I tell myself I can do anything for six months (or however long it is estimated to be). So my advice is just that: go over it; you can do anything for six months! It’s not a lifetime; the dissertation isn’t your career’s work (unless you want it to be), and you will get done and be ready to move into other important research tasks.

    So, get a good guide book (and a coach!), talk to your adviser, and go over it. When you’ve finished the project, you’ll be surprised at how much you actually like what you’ve done!

Recent Posts

Topics